Green and Hill Industries $GHIL trading suspended by SEC

Trading in Green and Hill Industries (GHIL) was suspended by the SEC this morning prior to the market open. This is the twelfth suspension of a marijuana-related stock this year. Here is a list of marijuana stocks that have been suspended by the SEC this year: GHIL,SKTOAEGYWBXU,FRTDFSPMPHOT,  CDFTPTOGAVNECBGI, and CANN. This suspension comes just four days after a cease trade order by the British Columbia Securities Commission

I blogged about the promotion of Green and Hill Industries back on June 4th. Trading will resume on GHIL at the market open on Tuesday, August 19th.

 

SEC trading suspension press release (PDF)

SEC trading suspension order (PDF)

The reasoning for the suspension was the standard boilerplate:

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of GHIL because of questions that have been raised about the accuracy and adequacy of publicly disseminated information concerning, among other things, the company’s operations.

The Commission acknowledges FINRA’s assistance in this matter.

 

ghil

Disclaimer: I have no position in any stock mentioned. I have no relationship with any parties mentioned above. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

Stock promoter Randy Hamdan sues SeekingAlpha author Matt Finston for Libel in response to negative article on Creative Edge Nutrition $FITX

Randy Hamdan, a stock promoter currently being sued by the SEC, has sued SeekingAlpha author Matt Finston for libel. See the article on SeekingAlpha that led to this. The case was filed in the Eastern District of Michigan; the case number is 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM. I saved a copy of the complaint and all exhibits (PDF). Finston is asking for support in defending against this suit. Below is an excerpt from the complaint:

8. Just a few examples of Defendant’s false and defamatory statements regarding Plaintiff are as follows: a. That Plaintiff has a “fraudulent past”. (See Exhibit A).
b. That Plaintiff and HH Group, LLC were issued 420 Million shares of stock in Creative Edge Nutrition Inc. (ticker symbol FITX) for $0.001 per share. (See Exhibit B).
c. That “Vgpr didn’t survive Hamden”, implying that Plaintiff caused Vega Biofuels Inc. to fail or go out of business. (See Exhibit C).
d. That “DNAX is another”, implying that Plaintiff caused DNA Brands, Inc. to fail or go out of business. (See Exhibit D).
e. That Plaintiff “dumped” FITX stock “into the promotion three years ago”. (See Exhibit E).
f. That Plaintiff is “a serial pump and dump and he’s been charged by the SEC for it.” (See Exhibit F).
g. That Plaintiff is “a known pump and dump”. (See Exhibit G).
h. That Plaintiff is “an investor relations ponzi”. (See Exhibit H).

j. That Plaintiff is “using more profiles to harass and intimidate and pump”. (See Exhibit J).

Below I examine each of these claims. Do note that I am not a lawyer so my opinion may not be the most informed on whether Hamdan has a good case or not.

a. “That Plaintiff has a “fraudulent past”.

While my lawyers would not like me to use these words if there has not been a criminal fraud conviction, the actions that Randy Hamdan is alleged to have engaged in by the SEC clearly fit the common definition of fraud even if he was not criminally charged with fraud (highlighting mine; excerpted from SEC legal complaint against Hamdan):

Randy A. Hamdan (“Hamdan”) began the scheme by creating a market with manipulative purchases and sales of the securities of CompuSonics in September 2009 through his wholly owned entity, Oracle Consultants, LLC (“Oracle Consultants”), and continued it with a marketing campaign that began in early October 2009 and culminated on October 19, 2009 with the issuance, by an international news distribution service, of a false press release regarding the company’s purported positive business developments

If Finston had used the modifier “allegedly” (because Hamdan has not settled or lost the case yet), his statement would be substantially true. If Hamdan does settle the SEC suit or loses it then he would have no cause for action on the basis of that statement.

b. That Plaintiff and HH Group, LLC were issued 420 Million shares of stock in Creative Edge Nutrition Inc. (ticker symbol FITX) for $0.001 per share. (See Exhibit B).

This is a true fact. Below are excerpts from the 2013 FITX annual report list of share issuances:

Shareholder | Number of shares issued | price
HH Group LLC. 3/4/2013 32,000,000 0.001 conversion Restricted
HH Group LLC. 3/4/2013 28,000,000 0.001 conversion Restricted
HH Group 5/5/2013 36,500,000 0.001 Paid debt Restricted
HH Group 5/8/2013 10,000,000 0.001 services Restricted
HH Group 5/15/2013 72,000,000 0.001 Paid line of credit off Restricted
HH Group LLC. 7/9/2013 52000000 0.001 Paid debt Restricted
HH Group LLC. 7/9/2013 10000000 0.001 Paid debt Restricted
HH Group LLC. 7/9/2013 5000000 0.001 Paid debt Restricted
HH Group LLC. 7/9/2013 20000000 0.001 Paid debt Restricted
Rhamdan 8/21/2013 10204081 0.001 Paid debt Restricted
Rhamdan 8/21/2013 10204081 0.001 Paid debt Restricted
Rhamdan 8/21/2013 20408163 0.001 Paid debt Restricted
Rhamdan 9/6/2013 50000000 0.001 Paid debt Restricted
HH Group, LLC 9/6/2013 10204081 0.001 Paid debt Restricted
HH Group, LLC 9/6/2013 10204081 0.001 Paid debt Restricted
HH Group, LLC 9/6/2013 40816326 0.001 Paid debt Restricted

c. That “Vgpr didn’t survive Hamden”, implying that Plaintiff caused Vega Biofuels Inc. to fail or go out of business. (See Exhibit C).

Vega Biofuels (VGPR) is still in business. However, if Finston meant that the stock price declined as a result of Hamdan, then his statement is correct. Selling by shareholders into paid promotions causes stocks to fall. Hamdan’s company paid for some promotion of VGPR. Example below:

StockRockandRollLLC® has been compensated three thousand cash for one-day coverage on VGPR by HH Group LLC. [excerpt from email received from stockloackandload.com.com on 4/20/2011]

d. That “DNAX is another”, implying that Plaintiff caused DNA Brands, Inc. to fail or go out of business. (See Exhibit D).

As with Vegas Biofuels, it is clear that while the company didn’t go out of business, the stock price dropped substantially, at least partially as a result of shareholders selling into the stock promotion that was at least partly paid for by Hamdan’s company HH Group LLC. See excerpt from a promotional email below:

Market Wrap Media, Inc. accepts compensation from companies for advertising services.
  Market Wrap Media, Inc. has been contracted to receive $2,500 by a third party (HH Group LLC) for 1 day of advertising service for DNAX. [excerpt from email received from pennystocknewspaper.com on 11/30/2011]

e. That Plaintiff “dumped” FITX stock “into the promotion three years ago”. (See Exhibit E).

This is the point of a stock promotion: to enable large shareholders to sell shares. It is a true fact that Hamdan owned (and continues to own) millions of shares and that his company HH Group LLC paid for numerous promotional emails promoting FITX back in 2012. Unless Hamdan and his companies did not sell any shares during the promotions this is a substantially true statement. While 2012 is only two years ago and not three, it is close enough for the statement to be substantially true and thus not libelous. Below is an excerpt from just one of many promotional emails on FITX I received in 2012, paid for by Hamdan’s HH Group LLC:

We expect to be compensated fifteen thousand dollars by a non-affiliate third party, HH Group, LLC, for a one week advertisement of Creative Edge Nutrition, Inc. [excerpt from email received from ExplosiveOTC.com on 110/1/2012]

f. That Plaintiff is “a serial pump and dump and he’s been charged by the SEC for it.” (See Exhibit F).

This is a true fact: Hamdan and his companies have paid for stock promotion on many companies (more than just the three that Finston mentioned). Paying for stock promotion and then selling shares is the very definition of a pump and dump. The SEC sued Hamdan for his role in the pump and dump of Compusonics in 2009:

FACTS Fraudulent Stock Marketing Campaign 8. From September 27, 2009 through October 19, 2009, Hamdan carried out a fraudulent marketing campaign designed to increase the trading price of CompuSonics’ stock. In substance, the fraudulent marketing campaign was to the effect that CompuSonics would soon release information concerning a settlement of a patent infringement matter that would “reward” shareholders. Hamdan caused the dissemination of materially false information concerning CompuSonics by means of stock newsletters, a website, a message board, and a press release. To facilitate the dissemination of the false information and conceal his role in the scheme, Hamdan employed an anonymous email service, a proxy server, and fictitious contact information.

g. That Plaintiff is “a known pump and dump”. (See Exhibit G).

This is a true fact (if you ignore Finston’s abuse of the English language): Hamdan’s companies have paid for multiple stock promotions.

h. That Plaintiff is “an investor relations ponzi”. (See Exhibit H).

This statement is meaningless hyperbole but even if it was libelous it was not made by Finston — he simply linked to a publicly accessible accusation by another individual.

[i. I have removed this complaint from this blog post and have removed my analysis of it. I believe that Finston made this comment to Hamdan and no one else saw it and it is thus not actionable. There is no need for me to further publicize it.]

j. That Plaintiff is “using more profiles to harass and intimidate and pump”. (See Exhibit J).

At least according to one message board poster I trust, Randy Hamdan has sent some nasty private messages to people and it would be reasonable to believe that the purpose of those messages was to intimidate. Oh, and meet “Michael Cheeseman” who appears to be Randy Hamdan.

So after looking at all the claims made by Randy Hamdan I conclude that his case is very weak. I may be wrong about that as I am not an expert.

Disclaimer: I have no position in any stock mentioned although I have traded FITX in the past. I have donated $400 to support Finston’s defense and I am in talks with him to further support his defense. This disclaimer will not be updated unless I update the blog post. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

SEC seeks $12.2 million penalty against Jean-Francois Amyot in Spencer Pharma case

The SEC has filed a proposed default judgement in their lawsuit against Jean Francois Amyot.

See the Stockwatch article for a good synopsis, excerpted below:

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a motion for a default judgment of up to $12.2-million against Quebec’s Jean-Francois Amyot, citing his “especially egregious” conduct in a 2010 pump-and-dump. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) The SEC says he sold 22 million unregistered shares of a pink sheets company called Spencer Pharmaceuticals Inc. while orchestrating a bogus takeover. The scheme involved several false and misleading news releases, and resulted in profits to Mr. Amyot of $5.8-million, according to the SEC.

 

See the original SEC litigation release and the SEC’s legal complaint from 2012.

Excerpt from the litigation release:

The Commission’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, alleges that beginning in November 2010, Spencer, a purported pharmaceutical company with addresses in Boston, Massachusetts, and Canada, disseminated false and misleading press releases claiming that it had received an unsolicited buyout offer from a Mideast company for $245 million when, in fact, the purported buyout offer was not real. The complaint further alleges that Arella and Morrice worked with Amyot to create and disseminate the fraudulent press releases. According to the complaint, while Spencer was issuing the press releases, the defendants were conducting a promotional campaign using Internet websites and newsletters to tout Spencer’s stock and the bogus buyout offer, and the false press releases and promotional campaign were successful in pumping up the price of Spencer’s stock. For example, after Spencer publically announced that the Mideast company proposed to pay $245 million for Spencer, the price of Spencer stock more than doubled in two days – opening at $0.25 per share on November 10, 2010 and closing at $0.60 per share on November 12 – and the daily trading volume for Spencer’s stock reached almost six million shares on November 11, compared to a daily average trading volume of less than 50,000 shares during the previous three months. During the time the buyout offer was being promoted, Amyot sold approximately 36 million Spencer shares for gross proceeds of approximately $5.8 million. Each of the defendants are charged by the Commission with violating various antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The complaint further charges Spencer, Amyot, and Arella with violating securities registration provisions of the securities laws. According to the complaint, Amyot and Arella were involved in a series of transfers involving 12 million Spencer shares that were done to evade the securities registration requirements and move the shares into an account controlled by Amyot.

 

Disclaimer: I have no position in any stock mentioned. I have no relationship with any parties mentioned above. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

Crumbs Bake Shop $CRMBQ bankruptcy update: Stalking horse bid details

Disclosure: I am short CRMBQ and I am a day-trader. I may close my short position or go long at any time. I am not a bankruptcy expert. This post is for informational purposes only.

 

Below is a copy of the docket in the Crumbs Bake Shop Inc (CRMBQ):

 

14-24287-MBK Crumbs Bake Shop, Inc.
Case type: bk Chapter: 11 Asset: Yes Vol: Judge: Michael B. Kaplan
Date filed: 07/11/2014 Date of last filing: 07/14/2014 
 

 

Doc.
No.
Dates Description
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Case Assigned
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Credit Card/Debit Card Payment
1
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Voluntary Petition (Chapter 11)
2
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion to Extend Time
3
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion for Joint Administration
4
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion (Generic)
5
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion (Generic)
6
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion (Generic)
7
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion to Retain Claims and Noticing Agent
8
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion (Generic)
9
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion to Reject
10
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion (Generic)
11
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Support
12
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Application for Designation as Complex Chapter 11 Case
13
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Application for Expedited Consideration of First Day Matters
15
Filed: 07/11/2014
Entered: 07/14/2014
Docket Text Notice of Missing Documents
14
Filed & Entered: 07/13/2014
Docket Text Notice of Appearance and Request
Filed & Entered: 07/14/2014
Docket Text Remark
16
Filed & Entered: 07/14/2014
Docket Text Shorten Time
17
Filed & Entered: 07/14/2014
Docket Text Amended Order (Generic)
18
Filed & Entered: 07/14/2014
Docket Text Notice of Appearance and Request
19
Filed & Entered: 07/14/2014
Docket Text Notice of Appearance and Request
20
Filed & Entered: 07/14/2014
Docket Text Notice of Appearance and Request
21
Filed & Entered: 07/14/2014
Docket Text Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice
22
Filed & Entered: 07/14/2014
Docket Text Motion (Generic)
23
Filed & Entered: 07/14/2014
Docket Text Application to Shorten Time
24
Filed & Entered: 07/14/2014
Docket Text Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Document #22 from yesterday includes the details of the Stalking Horse bid for Crumbs Bakeshop. Below are copies of all the documents related to that motion (all files are PDFs)

22
22-1
22-2
22-3
22-4

The actual stalking horse bid is in #22-2. Below are some of the relevant details:

ARTICLE III
CONSIDERATION; ADJUSTMENT
3.1 Consideration.
(a) The aggregate consideration for the Purchased Assets (the
“Purchase Price”) will consist of (i) an amount equal to and payable in the form of a credit bid of
the full amount of the obligations then outstanding under the DIP Credit Agreement and the Pre-
Petition Senior Secured Loan (such amount as may be increased pursuant to Section 3.1(b), the
“Credit Bid Amount”); and (ii) the assumption by Purchaser of the Assumed Liabilities.
(b) For the avoidance of doubt, at any time, and from time to time,
during the Auction, Purchaser may increase the Purchase Price by paying additional cash
consideration.

Note that the consideration does not include any payment to common shareholders of Crumbs Bake Shop.

Okay, so what liabilities are being assumed?

2.3 Assumption of Liabilities. On the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in this Agreement, at the Closing, or in connection with the Designation Rights, at such later
date as Purchaser assumes any Assumed Contract (the “Assumption Date”) Purchaser will assume,
effective as of the Closing or the Assumption Date, and will timely perform and discharge in
accordance with their respective terms, the following Liabilities of Sellers existing as of the Closing
Date or the Assumption Date (collectively, the “Assumed Liabilities”):
(a) All Liabilities of Sellers under the Assumed Contracts and the
other Purchased Assets that arise on or after the Closing Date or the Assumption Date, as the case
may be;
(b) Any Cure Costs that Purchaser is required to pay pursuant to
(c) Unpaid Administrative Expenses (other than those Administrative
Expenses associated with Sellers’ Professionals) in an aggregate amount up to $150,000, but only
to the extent such unpaid Administrative Expenses (other than those Administrative Expenses
associated with Sellers’ Professionals) exceed the amount of available cash and cash equivalents
on the Sellers’ balance sheet; and
(d) Any Transfer Taxes as provided in Section 10.1.

2.4 Excluded Liabilities. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth
herein, Purchaser will not assume and will be deemed not to have assumed, and Sellers will remain
liable with respect to, any and all Liabilities of Sellers arising out of, relating to or otherwise in
respect of the Business, the Employees, or the Purchased Assets prior to the Closing Date, and all
other Liabilities of Sellers, at any time existing or asserted, whether or not accrued, fixed, contingent
or otherwise, whether known or unknown, and whether or not recorded on the books and records of
Sellers or any of their Affiliates other than the Assumed Liabilities, (collectively, the “Excluded
Liabilities”). Purchaser will not be obligated to assume, and does not assume, and hereby disclaims
all of the Excluded Liabilities.

Also note that the purchaser is not assuming all the liabilities — some liabilities are excluded and will be retained by the empty shell of Crumbs Bake Shop (what shareholders own), leaving it with liabilities and no assets.

Now keep in mind that the stalking horse bid is an initial bid and the lowest price the assets can fetch. It is quite possible that another bidder could come in and bid enough for the assets that there would be some recovery for commmon shareholders. However, keep in mind that even this bid was a last-ditch, last-minute bid. The company was looking to liquidate in Chapter 7 after having engaged a firm to seek strategic buyers and being rebuffed by all of them — and this was a search not for buyers of the equity but for debtor-in-possession financing of a prepackaged bankruptcy (quote below from item 10-1).

14. Prior to the Filing Date, the Debtors retained GlassRatner Advisory & Capital
Group (“GlassRatner”) to, among other things, critically examine the Debtors’ business
operations and funding requirements. GlassRatner initiated a broad pre-petition marketing
process to solicit interest from potential investors. That dual track process targeted potential
investors that would (a) seek to acquire the Debtors’ business and/or (b) provide the Debtors
with capital to fund the ongoing operations. In consultation with the Debtors, GlassRatner
determined that only strategic investors or financial sponsors with an investment platform in the
specialty food sector could provide a viable solution given the critical state of the Debtors’
business. As such, only those parties that met that specific criteria were contacted.
15. Together with the Debtors, GlassRatner approached a total of 127 distinct parties
through 149 individual telephone calls. Of those parties contacted, 58 parties chose to receive
the “Investment Teaser” and/or requested additional information in order to evaluate a potential
transaction. All of the prospective investors contacted by GlassRatner, however, elected to pass
on the financing opportunity given: (a) concerns about the Debtors’ business operations; (b) the
Debtors’ financial condition; (c) recent results of operation and limited unencumbered assets;
and (d) the uncertainty around ultimate repayment. As of the Filing Date, GlassRatner’s
marketing effort did not result in a formal DIP loan proposal from any other third party.

Given the lack of interest then and the fact that Fischer/Lemonis entitites are already owed approximately $5 million by Crumbs Bake Shop and thus can afford to bid far more than other potential buyers (because $5 million of the purchase price is paying themselves). Couple that with the due diligence fee / breakup fee.

(b) If (i) this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 4.4(c) by
Purchaser or pursuant to Section 4.4(f), and (ii) a Competing Transaction is consummated, then
Sellers will pay to Purchaser in cash (A) an amount (the “Break-Up Fee”) equal to 3% of the
Purchase Price and (B) the Expense Reimbursement.

Assuming a $20 million purchase price, the breakup fee would be $700,000. And such a price is about equal to the company’s total liabilities so would result in little or no money being paid to holders of common equity in CRMBQ. Also, keep in mind that Crumbs continues to hemorrhage money: the net loss attributable to common stockholders in the first quarter of 2014 was $3,795,970.

The bottom line is that I think there is a very, very high probability that the common equity is worthless and shareholders get nothing. I expect the stock to fade slowly over the next few days to weeks.

[Edit 2014-7-17]: I completely misread the bid: the stalking horse bid is only for the amount of money owed to Lemonis Fischer Acquisition including the $1m in DIP financing they are offering, for a total bid of about $6.5 million. This would leave all other parties owed by Crumbs with little hope for recovery. Consequently equity holders are almost guaranteed to get nothing.

The roughly $6.5 million on the table is a “credit bid,” or a pledge of about $5.5 million in money already owed to Fischer as part of a loan it made to Crumbs this year, as well as money it will be owed as part of the bankruptcy loan, Crumbs’ lawyer Michael Sirota said in an interview.

Mr. Sirota said in court that the sale is on a tight timeline because the company will run out of money if the transaction doesn’t close around the end of next month.

Mr. Sirota, of Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A., said after the hearing that a competing bidder would probably have to offer about $7 million to top what already is on the table. That price takes into account a 3% breakup fee that would have to be paid to Fischer and Mr. Lemonis.

Above quote from yesterday’s WSJ article.

Disclosure: [Update 2014-7-17: I am no longer short CRMBQ but would reshort if I could find the shares] I am short CRMBQ and I am a day-trader. I may close my short position, short more, or go long at any time. I have no relationship with any parties mentioned above. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

Trading in Cynk Technology $CYNK suspended by SEC

On Friday, July 11th early in premarket (prior to 8AM Eastern) shares of CYNK were halted by FINRA and given a U3 “exraordinary event” halt code. That would be only the second ever FINRA halt of an OTC stock (following the halt of BOPT in 2013). However, the halt code was changed after 9:00AM to indicate that trading in the stock was suspended by the SEC. It appears that the FINRA halt was put out to prevent premarket trading in the stock in case the SEC suspension did not go into effect in time. The impetus for the halt and then trading suspension was of course the meteoric rise of the stock following wash trading, manipulated run-up, and then massive short-squeeze. I remind the reader that it is the SEC’s position that manipulating a stock to create a short squeeze is illegal market manipulation and they made that clear in their 2012 lawsuit against Harbinger Capital Partners.

SEC trading suspension release (PDF)
SEC trading suspension order (PDF)

CYNK will reopen for trading at the market open on Friday, July 25th. The reason for the trading suspension is as follows:

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of CYNK because of
concerns regarding the accuracy and adequacy of information in the marketplace and
potentially manipulative transactions in CYNK’s common stock.

There have been a few good articles about the CYNK manipulation, which has been unique in that it was not accompanied by any sort of paid promotion.

Best articles:

CYNK The Aftermath — Putting together more pieces to the puzzle (Promotion Stock Secrets)
Cynk Technology Is The New Scheme In Town (SeekingAlpha)

Decent articles:

Here’s What Happened When We Tried Calling The CEO Of CYNK (Business Insider)
JAVIER ROMERO: I’m Not Actually The CEO Of CYNK And I Never Received One Dollar In Compensation (Business Insider)
Here’s The Real Story Behind The Founding Of CYNK, The Mysterious Penny Stock With The Surge That Shocked The Internet (Business Insider)

Cynk Makes the Case for Buying Friends, Naked Short Selling (Bloomberg View)

Cynk Short Squeeze Blamed by Trader for Costing Him Job (Bloomberg)

Searching for Cynk: The $6 Billion Penny-Stock Debacle, From Belize to Las Vegas (Bloomberg)

While I currently have no position in CYNK, I had actively traded it early on and managed to lose money overall in June because of my poor trading in CYNK. Below is one of my larger losses (net I think I lost about $13k on it)


($6,556)lossCYNKShort Stock
IB batch import through 7/2/2014

Posted by MichaelGoode /
http://profit.ly/1Mp7wI

cynk

Disclaimer: I have no position in any stock mentioned. I have no relationship with any parties mentioned above. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

Crumbs Bakeshop $CRMB bankruptcy documents

Below you will find PDF copies of almost all of the filings in the Crumbs Bake Shop (CRMB) bankruptcy filing as of today. They are listed in the order they are shown in the docket. The case is 14-24287-MBK in the New Jersey district of US Bankrtupcy Court.

1
1-1
3
3-1
3-2
4
4-1
4-2
5
5-1
5-2
5-3
6
6-1
6-2
6-3
8
8-1
8-2
10
10-1
10-2
10-3
10-4
10-5
10-6
10-7
12
12-1
13
13-1
Ireland affidavit

Docket report:

14-24287-MBK Crumbs Bake Shop, Inc.
Case type: bk Chapter: 11 Asset: Yes Vol: Judge: Michael B. Kaplan
Date filed: 07/11/2014 Date of last filing: 07/13/2014 
 

Doc.
No.
Dates Description
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Case Assigned
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Credit Card/Debit Card Payment
1
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Voluntary Petition (Chapter 11)
2
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion to Extend Time
3
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion for Joint Administration
4
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion (Generic)
5
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion (Generic)
6
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion (Generic)
7
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion to Retain Claims and Noticing Agent
8
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion (Generic)
9
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion to Reject
10
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Motion (Generic)
11
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Support
12
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Application for Designation as Complex Chapter 11 Case
13
Filed & Entered: 07/11/2014
Docket Text Application for Expedited Consideration of First Day Matters
14
Filed & Entered: 07/13/2014
Docket Text Notice of Appearance and Request

Disclaimer: I have no position in any stock mentioned. I have traded CRMB many times over the last few days and will continue to trade it, both short and long. I have no relationship with any parties mentioned above. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

Windstream Technologies $WSTI: Who needs a test installation when you have Photoshop?

I highly recommend following @AuspexResearch on Twitter if you trade Windstream Technologies (WSTI). Here is one of his tweets:

 

I looked and what do you know, the photo on page 20 of WSTI’s most recent 10-K the photo of their product installed on a highway is in fact a Photoshopped photo from a random website from an old man who likes to walk around Sydney and take pictures of his walks.

[Edit 28 June 2014: I just wanted to clarify that @AuspexResearch is the one who found the use of Photoshop and pointed me to the website that the image came from — I am just bringing more attention and a longer explanation to what he pointed out on Twitter.]

First we have his photo:

artarmon-freeway-path-n

Then WSTI’s photo:

0001493152-14-001106_IMAGE_012

It is hard to tell that the photos are identical at first because of the vastly different sizes and the poor quality of the WSTI photo, but look at the cars: they are all the same.

While WSTI doesn’t explicityly state that the photo above is an actual installation, it doesn’t state that it is an artist’s rendition either, and an investor could be easily confused and think that the photo is an actual test installation:

WindStream will deploy its highway version of the TurboMill ® technology in parallel with its current marketing focus of Municipalities and light industry. In doing so, the Company has secured pilot test sites that will benefit from the installation of the TurboMill ® system. (see appendix) These pilot installations will enable WindStream to collect valuable data that will be used to drive additional sales and installations of this new energy platform.

Once this pilot has been undertaken and if successful, the Company will target other States, Countries, Utilities and Government institutions to market this new energy harvesting system and expand its reach and use cases. Just as vehicle draft on highways can drive TurboMills ® so can vehicles in tunnels (the Chunnel-26 miles in length), subway systems, trains, and rail systems.

See my previous blog post on the WSTI promotion. Also see The Deal article about it.

[Edit 2014-7-2]: I highly recommend reading the GeoInvesting blog post on WSTI today and how they blatantly photoshopped their product onto an Ikea store:

ikea

Disclaimer: I have no position in any stock mentioned. I have no relationship with any parties mentioned above. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

Full text of the Bestdamnpennystocks.com Cusimano/Boye indictment

The sealed indictment from May 19th of Jamie Boye, Eric Cusimano, and Jessica Cusimano was unsealed today. Thanks to Promotion Stock Secrets for uploading it (PDF). See my post yesterday about the indictment. I ran the PDF file through an online OCR and the full text (with some errors most likely) is below:

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 21
AO 91 (Rev. 02/09) Criminal Complaint

 

 
United States District Court
for the

Western District of New York

 

 

United States of America

v.
Case No. 14-M- tog
ERIC CUSIMANO,

JAMIE BOYE, and C•i, • – •• -• ,:,, ,:-..
. e,0 – ,…—– – . 7-1-7″^.•.,. ‘… ‘ ‘•
JESSICA CUSIMANO Aj”’,:fs” * ‘f .- • ”’`..,,,, ‘.. .4\
Defendant (-) f nlett, 19, ,,,L 0/4/

,.

 

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

 

I, the complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

 
(1) From on or about September 19, 2008, to on or about November 21, 2011, in the Western District of

New York, and elsewhere, ERIC CUSIMANO and JAMIE BOYE, the defendants, willfully and

knowingly, directly and indirectly, by use of the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, the

mails and the facilities of national securities exchanges, in connection with the purchase and sale of

securities, did use and employ, and cause to be used and employed, and did aid and abet the use and

employment of, manipulative and deceptive devices and contrivances, in violation of Title 17, Code of

Federal Regulations, Sections 240.10b-5, by: (a) employing devices, schemes, and artifices to defraud;

(b) making untrue statements of material fact and omitting to state material facts necessary in order to

make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not

misleading; and (c) engaging in acts, practices and courses of business which operated and would

operate as a fraud and deceit upon persons, to wit, ERIC CUSIMANO and JAMIE BOYE, the

defendants, participated in pump and dump schemes by touting various penny stock securities;

 
all in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff; Title 17, Code of Federal

Regulations, Sections 240.10b-5 and 240.10b5-2; and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2.

 
(2) On or about July 2, 2011, in the Western District of New York, ERIC CUSIMANO and JESSICA

CUSIMANO, and on or about November 16, 2009, in the Western District of New York, JAMIE

BOYE, knowingly engaged and attempted to engage in monetary transactions by, through, and to

financial institutions, affecting interstate and foreign commerce, in criminally derived property of a value

greater than $10,000, that is, deposits, withdrawals, transfers, and exchanges described below of United

States currency, funds, and monetary instruments in the amounts specified below, such property having

been derived from a specified unlawful activity, that is, securities fraud in violation of Title 15, United

States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff, Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Sections 240.10b-5 and

240.10b5-2, and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2; wire fraud in violation of Title 18, United

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 2 of 21

States Code, Sections 1343 and 2; and conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud in violation
of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371;
all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957 and 2.

 

This Criminal Complaint is based on these facts:

El Continued on the attached sheet.

 

 

Complainant’s signature

Michael K. Klimczak, Special Agent, IRS-CI
Printed name and title

Sworn to before me and signed in my presence.

Date: May / 2014 ( Judge’s signa ire

H. KENNETH SCHROEDER, JR.
City and State: Buffalo, New York United States Magistrate Judge
Printed name and title

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 3 of 21

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
I, Michael K. Klimczak, being duly sworn, depose and say:

1. I am a Special Agent with Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation
(IRS-CI) and have been so employed for approximately 12 1/2 years. I am currently assigned
to the New York Field Office, Buffalo Post of Duty to investigate crimes within the Western
District of New York. As part of my official duties, I investigation allegations of violations
of Federal criminal law, including statues that prohibit fraud and money laundering.

2. I make this affidavit in support of the annexed criminal complaint charging
ERIC CUSIMANO (“CUSIMANO”) and JAMIE BOYE (“BOYE”) with securities fraud,
in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff; Title 17, Code of
Federal Regulations, Sections 240.10b-5 and 240.10b5-2; and Title 18, United States Code,
Section 2. This affidavit is also made in support of the annexed criminal complaint charging
CUSIMANO, JESSICA CUSIMANO, and BOYE with money laundering by knowingly
engaging in monetary transactions in criminally derived property of a value greater than
$10,000, such property having been derived from a specified unlawful activity in violation of
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957 and 2.

3. The statements made in this affidavit are based upon my investigation,
information obtained from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), which
is the largest independent securities regulator in the U.S., as well as my training and
experience as a Special Agent with IRS-CI. Because this affidavit is submitted for the

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 4 of 21

purpose of a criminal complaint, I have not included each and every fact known to me
concerning this investigation. I have set forth only the facts that I believe are necessary to
establish probable cause to believe that CUSIMANO, BOYE, and JESSICA CUSIMANO
have violated securities fraud and money laundering statutes.

4. This investigation involves a scheme generally referred to as a “pump and
dump” stock fraud scheme. A pump-and-dump stock fraud scheme is a scheme designed to
fraudulently inflate the prices of publically traded stocks of companies, generally stocks of
companies with low stock prices (known as “penny stocks”), through a variety of fraudulent
and misleading statements and practices that are intended to deceive investors into believing
that prices at which they purchased and sold the penny stocks were determined by the
natural interplay of supply and demand, not rigged by manipulators. The time frame by
which a stock is pumped and then dumped is known as a campaign.

5. The investigation has focused on the operation of a stock fraud scam
involving CUSIMANO and BOYE, who touted publicly traded penny stocks by issuing and
publishing newsletters associated with various websites they controlled, including
www.bestdamnpennystocks.com and www.trypennystocks.com. CUSIMANO owned and
operated PREMIRE CONSULTING, INC., which was a privately held corporation
organized under the laws of the State of Nevada, and BOYE owned and operated
IMMACULATE-SEO, LLC, which was a limited liability company organized under the
laws of the State of Nevada.

2

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 5 of 21

 

6. Roles associated with pump-and-dump schemes are as follows:

a. One role is that of a promoter (“Promoter”), who is primarily
responsible for coordinating a given scheme to manipulate the price of
a targeted penny stock in exchange for compensation from company
management or another owner of the targeted stock who stood to
benefit from the manipulation. Once a targeted stock is identified and
funding acquired, a Promoter will coordinate efforts to pump up the
price of the stock in order to enable insiders in the scheme to sell at
maximum profit before the efforts to artificially inflate the price of the
stock collapsed.

b. Another role is that of a touter (“Touter”) who disseminates false or
misleading positive information to the marketplace through postings
on websites, message boards, “Twitter” accounts, and other online and
social media, among other means, in a coordinated manner to induce
recipients of the communications to buy the shares of targeted stocks.
Touts are coordinated at the direction of a Promoter (or at the Touter’s
own direction in those cases where a Promoter also served as a
Touter).

c. Another role is that of an account holder (“Account Holder”), who
opens up brokerage accounts and use, or allows the accounts to be
used by the co-conspirators, to buy and sell targeted stocks in large
volume, as well as to receive shares or cash as compensation to be
ultimately routed through their accounts to other participants in the
scheme. The use of multiple accounts to generate volume in targeted
stocks, and to receive and transfer proceeds of the scheme, enables the
participants in the scheme to minimize the risk of regulatory or law
enforcement suspicion falling upon them as a result of their ownership
of large amounts of shares of targeted stock, their high trading volume
in the targeted stock, and other indicia of participation in the scheme.
7. In general, a pump-and-dump worked as follows:

a. One or more Promoters will receive compensation from a client to run
a pump-and-dump scheme concerning a penny stock. Once the stock
is identified, a Promoter will recruit several Touters from a network
maintained by the Promoter to create mass communications that
would tout the targeted stock in a manner that appears coincidental,
but is actually timed to achieve the goals of the pump-and-dump
scheme by creating the illusion that independent analysts of penny
stock are coming to the same positive conclusion about the advisability
of purchasing targeted stock.
3

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 6 of 21

 

b. A Promoter will also generate trading volume in a targeted stock by
recruiting several Account Holders from a network maintained by the
Promoter, by Touters, or by others, to, among other things, generate
volume in the targeted stock that will pump up the share price of the
stock by creating the illusion of broad public interest in the stock, and
by creating the false impression of competition in the marketplace for
shares of the targeted stock. Participants in the scheme can employ
trading methods that would inject misleading information into the
marketplace about the demand for, and price of, the targeted stock.

c. Often, particularly when company insiders are benefitting from the
scheme, the targeted company itself will issue a press release or other
public announcement of a purported positive development during the
period that the targeted stock is being pumped. These efforts will be
coordinated with the efforts of Touters such that the investing public
will be left with the false impression that there is genuine interest from
both the investing public and from independent analysts of penny
stocks, and that there is a legitimate reason for the targeted company’s
stock to rise.

d. This combination of activities, in whole or in part, is intended to trick
unsuspecting investors into trading on the basis of the fraudulent and
misleading information that participants in the scheme had injected
into the marketplace, thereby increasing the upward momentum of the
stock. Particularly where all of the means and methods described
above were employed effectively and in coordination, this inflow of
money from the unsuspecting investing public would sufficiently pump
up the price of the shares of the targeted stock to permit those funding
the scheme to achieve their profit objectives. At that point, the
Promoter(s) responsible for the scheme with respect to that stock
would notify insiders that it was time to sell, or “dump,” the targeted
stock. Insiders—Promoters, Touters, and Account Holders among
them—would then, among other things, sell their shares and stop
trading in the stock, placing downward pressure on share prices and
causing trading volume to plummet, and Touters would often cease
continuing to promote the targeted stock. This combination of events
would tend to cause the price of a targeted stock whose price had been
successfully manipulated upwards by the scheme to decline, exposing
unsuspecting investors to significant losses.

 

8. A further mechanism used in a pump-and-dump scheme is to engage in

selective touting, whereby certain positive information regarding a targeted stock was
4

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 7 of 21

initially sent to one group of investors, and then after a delay in time, generally one or two
days, that same positive information regarding the targeted stock was sent to subsequent
groups of investors at different times. This practice of selective touting is used to manipulate
the length and intensity of a pump-and-dump scheme in that with each subsequent release of
positive information regarding the targeted stock, new unsuspecting investors were brought
into the scheme. The subsequent groups of investors were never told that the positive
information they were being provided had in fact been supplied to other investors days
earlier, and often were the investors that sustained the most losses when the price of the
targeted stock plummeted.

SECURITIES FRAUD
9. On or about February 2, 2008, CUSIMANO registered the website
www.bestdamnpennystocks.com through GoDaddy.com, shopper number 13786933.
According to their website, GoDaddy.com is a privately held company that is primarily an
internet domain registrar and web hosting company. An email account associated with this
website is staff@bestdamnpennystocks.com.

10. On or about October 22, 2008, BOYE registered the website
www.trypennystocks.com through GoDaddy.com, shopper number 21506413. An email
account associated with this website is staff@trypennystocks.com.

11. According to records obtained from the Nevada Department of State and
Nevada Corporate Headquarters, Inc., a company that assists individuals with
5

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 8 of 21

incorporating businesses in the state of Nevada, CUSIMANO incorporated PREMIRE
CONSULTING, INC., 30 Lakeview Drive, Apt. 9, Lakewood, NY 14750 on or about July
17, 2008. CUSIMANO lists his email address as staff@bestdamnpennystocks.com.

12. According to records obtained from the Nevada Department of State and GG
International, a company that assists individuals with incorporating businesses in the state
of Nevada, BOYE registered IMMACULATE-SEO, LLC, on or about January 28, 2009.
BOYE is listed as the sole member, with an address of 20 Lakeview Drive, Apt. 9,
Lakewood, NY 14750.

13. According to their website, iContact Corporation is an international online
service provider of email marketing and social media marketing to small, mid-sized, and
premier businesses. Records obtained from iContact Corporation indicated that account
number 323895 was created on or about September 09, 2008. The email address associated
with this account is staff@bestdamnpennystocks.com.

14. Based on an interview of BOYE, he and CUSIMANO worked together by
doing advertising for small cap companies. They obtained clients, also known as
subscribers, through advertising on internet websites such as Google. CUSIMANO and
BOYE conducted search engine optimization for the websites he registered so that his
websites would be more likely to be listed when an internet user conducted a search for
penny stocks. Interested subscribers could sign up to obtain stock alerts from
www.bestdamnpennystocks.com or www.trypennystocks.com. When a subscriber signed
6

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 9 of 21

up with CUSIMANO or BOYE’s website, they were added to a list of subscriber contacts
maintained through CUSIMANO and BOYE’s iContact Corporation account.

15. Included with the records received from iContact Corporation were emails
sent to thousands of CUSIMANO’s subscribers between September 2008 and November
2011 touting at least twenty seven (27) stocks. Records received from GoDaddy for the
staff@bestdamnpennystocks.com email indicate that CUSIMANO was a subscriber of the
www.trypennystocks.com website, and that BOYE, using the email
staff@trypennystocks.com was also touting some of the stocks as CUSIMANO during the
same time periods. One of those stocks touted was Cardiac Network Inc. (ticker symbol
CNWI), which occurred while CUSIMANO and BOYE resided in the Western District of
New York.

16. Information was obtained by a cooperating witness (herein after known as
CW1) regarding pump and dump campaign utilizing stock CNWI. According to CW1, the
scam was facilitated by William Goldstein and David Levy (Promoters), Peter Veugler
(account holder), and Donna Levy and CUSIMANO. CW1 met with these individuals in
New York City in approximately the summer of 2009 to set up the CNWI campaign. At
the meeting, CUSIMANO explained his stock touting operation.

17. CW1 explained that CUSIMANO had approximately 60,000 to 70,000
subscribers to his website, www.bestdamnpennystocks.com. CUSIMANO painted a picture
to his subscribers by putting out news that would help the stock increase in value. For
7

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 10 of 21

CNWI, CUSIMANO explained what kind of news he needed from Goldstein, David Levy,
and Donna Levy in order to get his subscribers to act on his email notifications. According
to CW1, the news CUSIMANO used for the campaign was “manufactured for the pump
and dump.”

18. CW1 told agents that the manner in which CUSIMANO put out his email
blasts was intended solely to pump the value of the stock. CUSIMANO explained how this
worked at the meeting in New York City. Once a campaign started, CUSIMANO would
send out three separate email blasts to three separate lists of subscribers over approximately
three days. The purpose of this was to drive up the price of the stock. According to CW1,
the subscribers included in the first email blast sent by CUSIMANO would start purchasing
the stock CUSIMANO was touting immediately. All of that buying would increase the
value of the stock. The subscribers that received CUSIMANO’s second email blast a day or
two later would purchase the stack at an inflated price due to the previous buying of the
stock. The subscribers that received CUSIMANO’s third email blast a day or two after the
second group were buying the stock at a highly inflated prices, prices those investors could
never recoup their money from. After the third email blast, CUSIMANO stopped sending
email blasts because the campaign ended causing the value of the stock to plummet leaving
investors who hadn’t sold their stock with huge losses.

19. According to the iContact records, the complete CNWI campaign ran from
September 2, 2009 to September 22, 2009. This included the primer email notifying
subscribers that a new recommended stock will be named soon (and variations of that same
8

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 11 of 21
primer), an email naming the new stock, distribution of news through press releases to get
subscribers to act on the stock, closing notifications each day reflecting the jump in stock
price for that day, and email primers for the next stock to be touted. The following chart
summarizes CUSIMANO’s newsletter distributions from www.bestdamnpennystocks.com
for CNWI:
Day One
Date Time Contents Recipients
09/02/200913:12:12Primer 28,800 Group A
09/02/200919:09:07CNWI Named Group A
09/02/200922:59:09Press Release 1 Group A
Day Two
Date Time Contents Recipients
09/03/200914:20:43Primer (v2) —2,528 Group B
09/03/200918:40:04CNWI Named (v2) Group B
09/03/200919:07:18CNWI Close Notification Group A
Da Three
Date Time Contents Recipients
09/04/200911:12:50Press Release 1 Group B
Day Four
Date Time Contents Recipients
09/07/200921:43:33Primer (v3) —436 Group C
09/07/200923:08:44Still CNWI Group A
09/07/200923:26:46Still CNWI (v2) Group B
Day Five
Date Time Contents Recipients
09/08/2009 9:04:51CNWI Named (v3) Group C
Day Six
Date Time Contents Recipients
09/09/2009 5:59:07Press Release 2 (KP) Group A
09/09/200923:47:31Close notification Group A
09/09/200923:59:40Close notification (v2) Group C
Day Seven
Date Time Contents Recipients
09/11/2009 3:27:35Close notification Group A
09/11/200911:24:46100% Buy Rating Group A
09/11/200911:52:17100% Buy Rating (v2) Group C
Day Eight

9

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 12 of 21

 

 

 
Date Time Contents Recipients

09/12/2009 2:02:51Congrats and Primer Group A

09/12/2009 2:13:58Congrats and Primer (v2) Group C

09/12/200916:23:36Pick Still CNWI Group A

09/12/200916:54:52Primer (v4) 2,500 Group D

Day Nine

Date Time Contents Recipients

09/13/2009 8:53:30CNWI Named (v4) Group D

09/13/200918:37: 7100% Buy Rating (v3) Group D

Day Ten

Date Time Contents Recipients

09/14/200923:33:31Healthy Pull Back Group A

Day Eleven

Date Time Contents Recipients

09/15/200920:53:52Solid Base still 100% Group A

Day Twelve

Date Time Contents Recipients

09/21/200917:16:59CNWI Congrats and Primer Group A
(EMGE)

Day Thirteen

Date Time Contents Recipients

09/22/200914:29:34CNWI Apology and Primer Group D
(EMGE)

 

 

 

 

20. Based on Daily Closing Prices and Share Volume comparisons for CNWI

 

received from FINRA, the share price on September 1, 2009, was approximately $.14 with

 

very little volume traded. On September 2, 2009, the day CUSIMANO named CNWI as

 

his new recommended stock to Group A (1st list of subscribers receiving email notifications),

 

the volume of stock traded increased slightly and the share price increases to $.17. By

 

September 3, 2009, the day CUSIMANO named CNWI to Group B (2’d list of subscribers

 

receiving email notifications), the stock volume traded increased significantly with the share

 

price increasing to $.26. By the time the third email is sent to Group C (3rd list of subscribers

 

receiving email notifications) on September 8, 2009, share price was at approximately $.30.

 

10

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 13 of 21

The stock price peaked at almost $.80 per share on or about September 12, 2009, and
thereafter plummeted to $.35 by September 17, 2009 and $.21 by September 23, 2009.

21. According to GoDaddy records, BOYE participated in the pump and dump
of CNWI by issuing email blasts using staff@trypennystocks.com to his own subscribers.
BOYE’s first email was sent on September 3, 2009, at which he issued a primer email that
named the stock. Thereafter, from September 4, 2009 to September 15, 2009, BOYE issued
approximately 12 emails to subscribers touting the CNWI stock.

22. CW1 recalled watching Veugler and Goldstein trading their shares of CNWI
stock (the dump) and realized what they were doing was a fraud.

23. According to the disclaimer on the bottom of the email notifications
CUSIMANO sent to his subscribers, CUSIMANO was compensated $150,000 cash from a
non-controlling third party to tout CNWI. The disclaimer on the bottom of the email
notifications BOYE sent to his subscribers indicated that he was compensated $75,000 cash
from an unlisted source to tout CNWI.
24. Responses from CUSIMANO’s subscribers to the
staff@bestdamnpennystocks.com stock notifications contain complaints from various
subscribers regarding being defrauded by CUSIMANO due to losing money based on
recommendations made by CUSIMANO.

11

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 14 of 21

 

25. I reviewed iContact records and email notifications sent by CUSIMANO to

subscribers using staff@bestdamnpennystocks.com, and Daily Closing Prices and Share
Volume comparisons received from FINRA. The following stocks touted by CUSIMANO

have the same characteristics as CNWI:

Date Range Company Ticker Symbol
September 19, 2008 to Zippi Networks, Inc. ZIPI
October 01, 2008
October 06, 2008 to Toro Ventures, Inc. TORO
October 07, 2008
October 10, 2008 to Russell Industries, Inc. RUSL
October 13, 2008
October 17, 2008 to Permanent Technologies, Inc. PERT
October 19, 2008
October 22, 2008 to Titan Resources International TNRI
October 24, 2008 Corporation
October 30, 2008 to Zippi Networks, Inc. ZIPI
November 06, 2008
November 07, 2008 to Healthy Coffee International, HCFI
November 14, 2008 Inc.
November 19, 2008 to Greencheck Technology, Inc. GCHK
November 20, 2008
December 21, 2008 to IDGlobal Corporation IDGC
January 10, 2009
January 30, 2009 to Banneker Inc. BANI
February 11, 2009
April 06, 2009 to United Treatment Centers, Inc.UTRM
April 13, 2009
June 17, 2009 to Enhance Skin Product, Inc. EHSK
June 18, 2009
September 21, 2009 to Emergent Health Corp. EMGE
September 25, 2009

 

12

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 15 of 21

 

October 13, 2009 to Alternative Energy ADEC
October 14, 2009 Development Corp.
October 27, 2009 to Total Nutraceutical Solutions, TNUS
November 02, 2009 Inc.
December 01, 2009 to SMC Entertainment, Inc. SMCE
December 16, 2009
January 05, 2010 to Eco Building Products, Inc. ECOB
January 11, 2010
March 03, 2010 to MedCareers Group, Inc. MCGI
March 07, 2010
March 23, 2010 to SMC Entertainment, Inc. SMCE
March 24, 2010
April 05, 2010 to Emerging World Pharma, Inc. EWPI
April 13, 2010
January 11, 2011 to Crosswind Renewable Energy CWNR
January 28, 2011 Corporation
February 09, 2011 to Raptor Technology Group, RAPT
February 17, 2011 Inc.
May 23, 2011 to High Plains Gas, Inc. HPGS
June 14, 2011
September 13, 2011 to Greenway Design Group, Inc. GDGI
September 15, 2011
October 19, 2011 to High Plains Gas, Inc. HPGS
October 20, 2011
November 17, 2011 to Greenway Design Group, Inc. GDGI
November 21, 2011
In addition, I have reviewed email notifications sent by BOYE to subscribers using

staff@trypennystocks.com, which has revealed that of the twenty-six (26) stocks listed

above, BOYE simultaneously touted the following fifteen (15) stocks promoted by

CUSIMANO, which indicates a targeted and joint pump and dump scheme to affect the

volume and price of shares traded:
13

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 16 of 21

 
Date Range Company Ticker Symbol
January 30, 2009 to Banneker Inc. BANI
February 7, 2009
April 02, 2009 to United Treatment Centers, Inc. UTRM
April 15, 2009
June 17, 2009 to Enhance Skin Product, Inc. EHSK
June 18, 2009
September 21, 2009 to Emergent Health Corp. EMGE
September 23, 2009
October 12, 2009 to Alternative Energy ADEC
October 19, 2009 Development Corp.
October 29, 2009 to Total Nutraceutical Solutions, TNUS
November 02, 2009 Inc.
December 08, 2009 to SMC Entertainment, Inc. SMCE
December 15, 2009
January 06, 2010 to Eco Building Products, Inc. ECOB
January 11, 2010
March 02, 2010 to MedCareers Group, Inc. MCGI
March 10, 2010
March 23, 2010 to SMC Entertainment, Inc. SMCE
March 25, 2010
April 05, 2010 to Emerging World Pharma, Inc. EWPI
April 08, 2010
January 07, 2011 to Crosswind Renewable Energy CWNR
January 20, 2011 Corporation
February 08, 2011 to Raptor Technology Group, RAPT
February 13, 2011 Inc.
May 23, 2011 to High Plains Gas, Inc. HPGS
June 15, 2011
September 08, 2011 to Greenway Design Group, Inc. GDGI
September 15, 2011

 

 

14

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 17 of 21

26. According to the disclaimer on the bottom of the email notifications
CUSIMANO sent to his subscribers, CUSIMANO was compensated approximately
$4,268,000 to tout the above named twenty-six (26) stocks. In his disclaimers, CUSIMANO
typically referred to the entities that were compensating him as “third parties.” According
to the disclaimer on the bottom of the email notification BOYE sent to his subscribers,
BOYE was compensated approximately $980,000 to tout the above named fifteen (15)
stocks.

27. Another cooperating witness that worked for CUSIMANO and BOYE
(herein after referred to as CW2) provided information on CUSIMANO and BOYE’s stock
touting operation. According to CW2, BOYE stated that he was working for CUSIMANO
“designing websites.” After CW2 got to know them, CUSIMANO and BOYE referred to
their business as a “pump and dump” instead of “stock speculating.”

28. CW2 specifically told the agents about a campaign involving the stock BANI
that started in approximately February 2009. According to CW2, this was done out of
CUSIMANO’s apartment at the Fairmont Hills Apartments located in Lakeview, NY.
CW2 said that there was a significant amount of manipulation in the BANI campaign so
that CUSIMANO and Donna Levy could sell the shares of BANI stock they owned prior to
CUSIMANO’s subscribers. According to CW2, CUSIMANO and Levy made millions of
the BANI campaign.
15

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 18 of 21

29. CUSIMANO maintains bank accounts for PREMIRE CONSULTING INC.
at Wells Fargo Bank. CUSIMANO opened account number 9092478149 in the name
PREMIRE CONSULTING INC. on July 25, 2008. He is the sole signor on the account.
Analysis of the account reflects a total of $1,831,985 was deposited into the account, mostly
through wire transfers received by third parties. On or about May 26, 2009, CUSIMANO
ceased using this account and transferred the $793,888 balance to Wells Fargo account
number 8174859929.

30. CUSIMANO opened account number 8174859929 in the name PREMIRE
CONSULTING INC. on May 26, 2009. He is the sole signor on the account. Analysis of
the account reflects that, between May 26, 2009, and January 27, 2012, a total of $6,089,722
was deposited into the account, mostly through wire transfers received by third parties.

31. According to BOYE, he was paid $20,000 to $30,000 to advertise companies
to his subscribers’ lists. His business bank account is located at M&T Bank. BOYE opened
account number 9849203931 in the name of IMMACULATE SEO LLC on July 15, 2008 at
a branch located in Orchard Park, NY. He is the sole signor on the account. Analysis of
the account reflects a total of $1,376,163.01 was deposited into the account, mostly through
wire transfers received by third parties. The deposits included five wire transfers totaling
$27,750 from PREMIRE CONSULTING, INC.

 

16

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 19 of 21

MONEY LAUNDERING
32. On or about the dates discussed below, in the Western District of New York,
and elsewhere, CUSIMANO utilizing the business he incorporated, PREMIRE
CONSULTING, INC., BOYE utilizing the business he incorporated, IMMACULATE-
SEO, LLC, and JESSICA CUSIMANO, knowingly engaged in monetary transactions by,
through, and to financial institutions, affecting interstate and foreign commerce, in
criminally derived property of a value greater than $10,000, that is, deposits, withdrawals,
transfers, and exchanges described below of United States currency, funds, and monetary
instruments in the amounts specified below, such property having been derived from a
specified unlawful activity, that is, securities fraud in violation of Title 15, United States
Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff; Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Sections 240.10b-5
and 240.10b5-2; and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2.

33. While visiting the Western District of New York, specifically Lakewood,
New York, from their residence in Texas during the summer of 2011, CUSIMANO and
JESSICA CUSIMANO purchased a 2011 Bennington pontoon boat from Snug Harbor
Marina for $48,564.63. In addition to an $8,000 cash deposit made on the day of the sale,
CUSIMANO paid the remaining balance of $40,564.63 utilizing check no. 1074 drawn on
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. account no. 8174859929 dated 07/02/2011. This account is in the
name of PREMIRE CONSULTING INC. and CUSIMANO. At the time CUSIMANO
wrote the check, his sole source of income was the pump and dump stock fraud scheme
detailed above.

17

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 20 of 21

34. In furtherance of the money laundering scheme, the 2011 Bennington
pontoon boat was registered in JESSICA CUSIMANO’s name, using a recently obtained
New York State driver’s license listing her current residence as 169 Front Street, Lakewood,
NY 14750, which was the address of the lakeside cabin they rented while visiting from
Texas.

35. JESSICA CUSIMANO obtained insurance for the 2011 Bennington Pontoon
boat from Progressive Direct Insurance Company on 07/02/2011, policy number 18884772-
0. On the application for the insurance, JESSICA CUSIMANO listed her maiden name,
JESSICA LOPEZ, and listed her current residence as 169 Front Street, Lakewood, NY
14750, and listed her marital status as “single.”

36. On or about November 16, 2009, BOYE wrote a check in the amount of
$49,154.31 drawn on M&T Bank account 9847916138 (Jaime Boye) payable to Robert Basil
Chevrolet as payment for a 2007 Cadillac Escalade. At the time BOYE wrote the check, his
sole source of income was the pump and dump stock fraud scheme detailed above.

 

 

 

18

Case 1:14-mj-00069-HKS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 21 of 21

 
37. Based upon the foregoing, your affiant respectfully submits that there is

probable cause to believe that ERIC CUSIMANO and JAMIE BOYE have committed

securities fraud in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff; Title

17, Code of Federal Regulations, Sections 240.10b-5 and 240.10b5-2; and Title 18, United

States Code, Section 2; and that ERIC CUSIMANO, JESSICA CUSIMANO, and JAMIE

BOYE violated Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957 and 2.

 

 

Michael K. Klimczak, Specie 1 Agent
IRS-CI
Sworn to and subscribed to before me this
19′ day of May 2014.

 
HC7N. H. KENNETH SCHROEDER, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

 

Disclaimer: I have no position in any stock mentioned. I have no relationship with any parties mentioned above. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

Baristas Coffee Company $BCCI files ‘audited’ quarterly financial statements

While accounting in real companies is usually boring, penny stock accounting is almost always exciting, whether it is a $100m+ market cap company with fewer total assets than I have in my checking account (like GHIL), companies with financial statements so badly faked as to make me suspect brain damage rather than intent to defraud, and now the case of the unaudited “audited” financial statements, courtesy of Baristas Coffee Company (BCCI).

First, I should thank the intrepid researchers on the Investorshub Due Diligence Fraud and Support Team message board for bringing this to my attention. Janice Shell was the first to notice the problems with the quarterly financial statements published yesterday by BCCI. See some of the replies (and more replies) to her post. The problem is that while the statements clearly state in multiple locations that they are audited, there is no auditor letter included with them. Furthermore, they are quarterly financial statements, which are generally never audited (though they normally pass auditor review). It is possible that the statements were audited and the company forgot to include the auditor letter. Perhaps worse is that the ‘audited’ statements don’t match the prior period unaudited statements. The starting cash ($0) on January 1, 2014 is different than the ending cash on Dec 31 ($43,645). And the intangible assets (which make up almost 95% of the company assets) drop by over $4 million between periods with no treatment on the income statement.

The CEO of Baristas Coffee Company, Barry Henthorn, doubled down on the ‘audited’ claim by issuing a press release this morning stating in part (emphasis mine):

Baristas Files Audited Financials – Moves Forward With Uplisting to Senior Exchange

Jun 05, 2014
OTC Disclosure & News Service

SEATTLE, June 5, 2014 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Baristas Coffee Company, Inc. (OTCPK:BCCI), announced that it has completed its audited financials which meet PCAOB standards and has filed its first set of audited financials. The filing of audited quarterly financials for the period ending March 31, 2014 can be viewed at www.otcmarkets.com under Filings and Disclosures. Baristas will be filing amended audited 10K and 10Q financials for years 2012, 2013 in the next week. Subsequently the Company will be filing its Registration Statement and will become fully reporting and will up list accordingly to a senior exchange.

CEO Barry Henthorn stated: “Becoming fully audited was among the most significant steps towards moving to a senior exchange and becoming a fully reporting public company. All legacy adjustments are now reflected according to PCAOB auditing standards and only revenues that were completely verifiable through the audit were recognized. In addition all stock based compensation has been reflected appropriately of which the Company does not foresee any upcoming substantial issuances. The processes and accounting review policies are now in place to allow all future revenues to flow to the books of the company and to produce and review timely audited financial statements.”

It is quite possible that Baristas Coffee has actually had a real audit done on its financial statements but it makes no sense to me why they would put out their Q1 2014 financials prior to restating their financials for the last two years. If these financials are not produced soon then I believe Barsistas Coffee is at risk for an SEC trading suspension.

On a side note, DKM CPAs, which Baristas Coffee Company lists as it “accountant or auditor” in the filing yesterday. DKM previously received a nasty-gram from the PCAOB (PDF) two years ago.

 

Disclaimer: I have no position in any stock mentioned above. I have no relationship with any parties mentioned above. I have submitted my concerns to the This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.

The Most obviously fake financial statement I have ever seen, courtesy of $FRTD

There are few words that can adequately describe this quarterly report from non-SEC reporting company Fortitude Group (FRTD), which is currently suspended from trading after their absurd buyout press release. Read the 1st quarter report at OTCMarkets.com. There is so much idiocy in this report that I cannot do more than scratch the surface. But take a look at the cash flow statement for a start (on page 3).

The cash flow statement has the number of shares issued to pay for services as the dollar value of those shares, which of course don’t even belong in the “cash flows from operating activities.” The two acquisitions mentioned in the “cash flow from investing activities” section are just as nonsensical: it doesn’t matter that FRTD thinks those investsments are worth $38 million and $24 million — Fortitude Group didn’t pay those amounts in cash so they do not belong on the cash flow statement. The best part is that the “net increase in cash” of $63,194,456, when combined with the cash at the beginning of the quarter ($153) should add up to the “cash at end of period”; this is a very, very basic principle. But somehow FRTD only ended the quarter with $412,162. In other words, the company is off by over $62 million in its “net increase in cash”.

The balance sheet is just as bad: “stockholders equity” is, by definition, total assets minus total liabilities. But it also must equal the sum of paid in capital and retained earnings / accumulated deficit. For an example of how that works, look at the balance sheet of Livedeal (LIVE). The total stockholders equity is equal to the sum of the par value of all shares outstanding, the paid in capital, and the accumulated deficit. However with FRTD the resulting sum is $3,541,332 (and not $62,791,956).

[Edit 2014-6-9]: See George Sharp’s article on FRTD.

 

Disclaimer: I have no position in any stock mentioned. I have no relationship with any parties mentioned above. This blog has a terms of use that is incorporated by reference into this post; you can find all my disclaimers and disclosures there as well.